|
|
Website Redesign on a Shoestring?
3:16 PM EST 11/8/07
My system is on the verge of a large user-awareness campaign to increase our residents' knowledge of the services we provide. Included in this process is the idea that we make drastic changes to our website, as our current design is not much more than an "in" to our catalog.
We have almost no budget for this. We have no staff time for this. We posted an RFP to website design vendors and got a few responses from across the country that told us we needed $20,000 or better to build a website that is accessible, flexible enough to build social webapps into it, and can dynamic enough to allow for staff to provide updates.
While I am of the opinion that there is no better way to improve and increase our patron services without seriously adding to staff time, the money and staff time are serious impediments to our organization being able to do much more than continue along the path we are now...
So, I guess my question is: anyone out there that has the same problem? That HAD the same problem and solved it? Underwent a website design at all, and paid for it in creative ways?
Things we are considering: -making the argument to our Board that $20,000 + $10,000 a year is a SMALL price to pay for something that could provide so many users services that we wouldn't otherwise be able to provide.
-beginning a fund-raising campaign amongst patrons/Friends/etc for the express purpose of building a website
-doing it piecemeal over time: Build a template and build our web-content around it over time....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Website Redesign on a Shoestring?
12:03 PM EST 11/9/07
as a reply to Geoff Fitzpatrick.
Great question! We've made it the [url http://webjunction.org/forums/message.jspa?messageID=48031#48031]Question of the Week[/url] so be sure to check back for more answers (thank's chrisabo) here or as comments on [url http://blog.webjunctionworks.org/index.php/2007/11/09/question-of-the-week-redesign-on-a-shoestring/]BlogJunction[/url].
Thanks for your question!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Website Redesign on a Shoestring?
9:53 PM EST 11/9/07
as a reply to Geoff Fitzpatrick.
Here's an alternate suggestion from Alan Kirk gray that I just stumbled upon over at the Walking Paper blog:
http://www.walkingpaper.org/510
"Third, they should band together in peer groups of ten libraries each, distributed nationally so they are at a distance from one another, and contract jointly for a full-blown web site redesign that incorporates a state-of-the-art Content Management infrastructure, integrated Customer Management applications, fully-developed social software attributes and a link to their ILS, with the agreement each library may skin the resulting deliverable in its own image and fill it with its own content, with the result that each library receives the benefit of significant professional work product at one-tenth the going rate."
Maybe you could join with other libraries to share the cost of building out the infrastructure and then devote the resources to filling in the content gradually (or maybe getting community volunteers to tackle part of that depending on the nature of the content).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Website Redesign on a Shoestring?
3:07 PM EST 11/12/07
as a reply to Geoff Fitzpatrick.
Why not have an intern create your page? Many colleges and universities have departments who are looking to provide their students with practical experience while they are in school. College credit or community service time may be enough to get your page up and going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Website Redesign on a Shoestring?
6:26 PM EST 11/26/07
as a reply to Geoff Fitzpatrick.
Thanks, folks for your replies...Honored to be Question of the Week, too!
As an update, and in response to a couple of questions posted earlier: our RFP was posted at http://www.wcls.org/websiterfp.htm, and we received only two replies...none locally. We did contact lots of local vendors and let them know about our needs, and after we didn't receive responses from them we asked them why. The answers we got fell under the following categories:
1) We were too busy for your timeframe. 2) We don't respond to RFP's with no budget. 3) We don't respond to project requests with govenmental agencies.
Our impressions behind the responses:
#2 - we didn't post our budget because we really wanted to get an indication of market price to do a truly professional job (what we have now was done piecemeal over time and looks it). Later indications from those who answered #2 was that we couldn't afford them in a million years anyway. We couldn't blame companies for not responding, either: who wants to spend a week putting together an RFP only to find that the budget is $10,000?
#3 - Not sure about this one. My guess is that experience has told them that we'd be underneath what a logical budget for such a project should look like.
We've made the argument to our Board that in light of our need to increase our userbase WITHOUT increasing traffic in our already-cram-packed branches, we need a modern web platform from which to build new services. Given what we already spend on our branches, $20K is nickels and dimes...
Thanks everyone for your responses, and I'll be posting updates as I get them!
|
|
|
|