Sarah,
I'm so glad to hear about iPeer! It reminds us of how important it is to recognize that our own peers have so much to offer in terms of mentoring. As a student I often found those in the program more capable of providing support with challenges than faculty or those out in the field. I think we quickly forget the intensity or urgency of the experience when time has blurred our memories.
You bring up an interesting issue about matching participants. One of the "myths" of mentoring is that people need to have a lot in common. I would encourage you to consider the benefits of "mis-matching" participants; as
Cheryl Dahle] says, the best matches are often mismatches because they generate high potential for learning. I do think it's great that you've found a way to match folks geographically. I'm sure it helps to be able to increase the FTF (face to face)!!
I've included some of the other "myths" in a
mentoring workbook posted in the WJ
mentoring area.
I look forward to hearing how the first quarter of iPeer worked for people and your suggestions as facilitator of an e-mentoring program. Like everything else, I'm sure mentoring will increasingly become an online phenomenon (in a good way :-)).