<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Quantifying digital branch success?</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=921031&amp;threadId=80620827" />
  <subtitle>Quantifying digital branch success?</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Quantifying digital branch success?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=921031&amp;messageId=80630953" />
    <author>
      <name>David King</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-09-15T22:29:38Z</updated>
    <published>2009-09-15T22:29:38Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Ah. State annual report stats are at least 10 years behind where they need to be. Just the normal &amp;#034;how many visits per year for electronic resources&amp;#034; question is lame&amp;#045;o, in my estimation. What do they really mean? Just the website? How about the databases? How about the catalog? etc... Pretty much ALL the questions on that report are the same.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead of worrying about that &amp;#045; just answer those silly state questions as best as you can. Then focus on what matters to your customers, your boss, and your library. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or even better &amp;#045; send those into your state agency and let them know their report doesn&amp;#039;t work for what you&amp;#039;re counting. You might get some good discussion and/or changes kick&amp;#045;started!</summary>
    <dc:creator>David King</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T22:29:38Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Quantifying digital branch success?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=921031&amp;messageId=80630949" />
    <author>
      <name>David King</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-09-15T22:26:06Z</updated>
    <published>2009-09-15T22:26:06Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&amp;#035; of visitors&lt;br /&gt;time on site&lt;br /&gt;entrance and exit pages&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take a look at this post &amp;#045; /&lt;a href='http://blog.ogilvypr.com/2009/06/introducing&amp;#045;conversation&amp;#045;impact&amp;#045;social&amp;#045;media&amp;#045;measurement&amp;#045;for&amp;#045;marketers/'&gt;http://blog.ogilvypr.com/2009/06/introducing&amp;#045;conversation&amp;#045;impact&amp;#045;social&amp;#045;media&amp;#045;measurement&amp;#045;for&amp;#045;marketers/&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#045; they include some very interesting ideas for measurement, including Sentiment index &amp;#040;&amp;#037; positive &amp;#045; &amp;#037; negative&amp;#041; in social media, Share of positive voice in social media, within category, Relative Net Promoter Score, absolute or within category.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can also measure action &amp;#045; set up a registration page and then count registrations. Or ask people to click a link to read, then count the number of clicks &amp;#040;this is also called conversion&amp;#041;.</summary>
    <dc:creator>David King</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T22:26:06Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Quantifying digital branch success?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=921031&amp;messageId=80620923" />
    <author>
      <name>Jennifer Peterson</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-09-15T20:37:55Z</updated>
    <published>2009-09-15T20:37:55Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Another person asked David: are those stats recognized by your state annual report?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Peterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T20:37:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quantifying digital branch success?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=921031&amp;messageId=80620826" />
    <author>
      <name>Jennifer Peterson</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-09-15T20:14:40Z</updated>
    <published>2009-09-15T20:14:40Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Another great question posed in the &lt;a href='/virtual&amp;#045;library/&amp;#045;/articles/content/80470928'&gt;Building the Digital Branch for the 21st Century&lt;/a&gt; webinar with David Lee King.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How do you quantify digital success, other than &amp;#035; of visitors?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A similar question was asked in the webinar: &lt;a href='/events/webinars/webinar&amp;#045;archives/&amp;#045;/articles/content/67701125'&gt;Bringing Web 2.0 into Academic Libraries&lt;/a&gt;. And some discussion on it &lt;a href='/technology/web&amp;#045;tools/&amp;#045;/resources/discussion/68364166'&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do you think?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Peterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T20:14:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

