<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>two-sided printing?</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=404132&amp;threadId=4284687" />
  <subtitle>two-sided printing?</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: two-sided printing?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=404132&amp;messageId=4284695" />
    <author>
      <name>Pam Henley</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2006-02-08T19:36:03Z</updated>
    <published>2006-02-08T19:36:03Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Thanks, Dale. At least it gives us something to think about!</summary>
    <dc:creator>Pam Henley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-08T19:36:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: two-sided printing?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=404132&amp;messageId=4284691" />
    <author>
      <name>Dale Musselman</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2006-02-07T17:26:54Z</updated>
    <published>2006-02-07T17:26:54Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Pam&amp;#045;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My experience with these type of printers &amp;#040;HP and non&amp;#045;HP&amp;#041; is that they do work well. However, it is always a printer properties option. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So you would have to choose a default &amp;#040;either at the computer or print server level, depending on your setup&amp;#041;, and then to change that, the user has to bring up the print dialogue box and go in to the printer properties. Either way, there will be a patron with issues about it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if you defaulted it to double&amp;#045;sided, and pointed out it was saving the patron money, I would think most would be happy with that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, if you default it to double sided, you can still print multiple 1 page copies &amp;#045; they would come out correctly.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Dale Musselman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-07T17:26:54Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>two-sided printing?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=404132&amp;messageId=4284686" />
    <author>
      <name>Pam Henley</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2006-02-06T23:50:29Z</updated>
    <published>2006-02-06T23:50:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">We had a comment from a patron recently asking if we could get a printer that would do double&amp;#045;sided printing as a way to save paper &amp;#040;and money, since they are charged by the page&amp;#041;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In looking at HP printers, I found a few that do automatice double&amp;#045;sided printing but wondered if anyone had any experience with these? Is it something patrons can choose &amp;#040;which I think would be difficult, since few rarely look at the choices in the print window&amp;#041;? What if someone just wanted several copies of a single page document &amp;#045; is it going to give them that option? I&amp;#039;m just not convinced the advantages for a few patrons would out&amp;#045;weigh the problems that could come up! But I&amp;#039;d like to hear from others...</summary>
    <dc:creator>Pam Henley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-06T23:50:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

